Synthetic gas research and exÂperimental costs . A natural gas company’s payments to an industry association of which it is a member to help fund, under an agreement with the Department of Interior, an organization to develop a coal gasification program for the proÂduction of synthetic gas are reÂsearch and experimental expendiÂtures for the purposes of section 174 of the Code.
Rev. Rul. 73-324
Advice has been requested whether, under the circumstances described beÂlow, certain payments made by a taxÂpayer to an association qualify as research and experimental expendiÂtures pursuant to section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
The taxpayer, a domestic corporaÂtion, is engaged primarily in the busiÂness of purchasing, transporting by pipeline, and selling natural gas to utility companies and industrial and residential consumers.
In 1971, the United States DepartÂment of the Interior entered into an “agreement” with an association of which the taxpayer is a member. The association represents companies enÂgaged in the same business as the taxÂpayer and is exempt from tax under section 501 of the Code.
The agreement between the DepartÂment of the Interior and the associaÂtion arises as a result of a growing energy supply problem in the United States. One possible solution to the problem involves coal gasification, which is a process by which coal and hydrogen are made to react to form a synthetic gas which can be used in the nation’s pipelines to supplement natural gas.
The agreement provides for the creation and mutual funding of an orÂganization to provide a research plan to develop a coal gasification program. The funding of the program will be apportioned between the association and the Department of the Interior. The association will raise its share of the funding through payments from its membership, including the taxpayÂer, and other interested parties which are not members of the association.
The amounts paid by the taxpayer and others to the association, in conÂnection with the program, will be maintained as a separate fund to be used only in support of the program and are not refundable.
Section 174(a)(1) of the Code proÂvides, in general, that a taxpayer may treat research or experimental expendÂitures that are paid or incurred by him during the taxable year in connection with his trade or business as expenses that are not chargeable to capital acÂcount. The expenditures so treated shall be allowed as a deduction.
Section 174(b) of the Code proÂvides, in part, that a taxpayer may elect under certain circumstances to defer and deduct ratably research or experimental expenditures over a peÂriod of not less than 60 months.
Section 1.174-2(a)(2) of the InÂcome Tax Regulations provides, in part, that the provisions of this secÂtion apply not only to costs paid or incurred by the taxpayer for research and experimentation undertaken diÂrectly by him but also to expenditures paid or incurred for research or experÂimentation carried on in his behalf by another person or organization (such as a research institute, foundation, enÂgineering company, or similar conÂtractor).
Rev. Rul. 69-484, 1969-2 C.B. 38, holds that payments made by an airÂline transportation company to an airÂline manufacturer that will design, develop, fabricate, and test prototype aircraft constitute research and experiÂmental expenditures under section 174 of the Code.
Accordingly, based upon the above described facts, amounts paid or inÂcurred by the taxpayer under the agreement for the development of the coal gasification research program are research or experimental expenditures for purposes of section 174 of the Code.






